
Business
Good Strategy/Bad Strategy
Richard Rumelt
4.1 (11000) 8 min read 5 key ideasPremium
A strategy scholar's argument that most corporate 'strategy' is actually vague goal-setting, and a framework for building strategies with real teeth.
Key takeaways
- Much Purported Strategy Is Actually Fluff Lacking Genuine Substance
- Good Strategy Requires an Honest Diagnosis of the Actual Challenge
- A Guiding Policy Provides Coherent Direction for Addressing the Diagnosis
- Coherent Action Translates Policy Into Concrete Implementation
- Genuine Strategy Requires Making Difficult Trade-Off Choices
Action checklist
- Diagnose the actual core challenge behind your current goal before proposing a solution
- Write a guiding policy for one problem instead of just listing more goals
Final takeaway
Rumelt's closing invitation: apply his complete framework — honest diagnosis, coherent guiding policy, and coordinated coherent action — while explicitly embracing the difficult trade-off choices genuine strategy requires, rather than producing the vague, substantively empty 'bad strategy' the book critiques throughout as an unfortunately common organizational pattern.
Ratings & Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your thoughts.






